Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Pride and Prejudice: Theatrical version vs. A&E

This weekend I rented the theatrical version of Pride and Prejudice. I must admit that I had some apprehensions, knowing that a lot of material would have to be left out and considering how much I absolutely love the A&E version. Suprisingly, though, I really did enjoy it. Thus a movie comparison began and these are my thoughts:

Things I liked more about the theatrical version:

1) Mrs. Bennett's character was SO much more tolerable! Although she did retain the essence of her character, she also portrayed a woman who was just desperate to have her family cared and provided for.

2) The casting of the Bennett sisters as a whole was great! I liked Jane much better in this version, more human and less like someone straight out of a renaissance painting. Keira Knightly did a fabulous job, though I think I like her and the Lizzy from A&E equally. They each portrayed the character well with little different nuances. The rest of the girls were pretty much identical to that of the A&E version, but that's probably because those characters and fairly one-dimensional and leave little room for interpretation.

3) The cinematography was fantastic! I just liked the overall feel of the movie rather than a more "mini-series" feel of the A&E version.

Things I liked better from the A&E version:

1) Mr. Bennett's character was more what I pictured him to be like rather than how he was done in the theatrical version. I like him to be more sarcastic, not at all caught up in the craziness of the family, and more of a idealic character. The theatrical version made the character a lot more human with several flaws, and I just preferred the other interpretation.

2) Details, details, details. They did have to leave a lot out for the theatrical version. Most importantly, I think, they left out much of the development of Mr. Wiccam's interaction with the Bennetts and Lizzy in particular. Leaving out many portions of the book did not take away the central idea and I think that it helped the movie to flow more quickly, but I would rather see the whole picture and more character development.

3) Last, and most importantly I think, Colin Firth is THE Mr. Darcy. I didn't like the way that they interpreted Mr. Darcy's character during the beginning develpment of his relationship with Lizzy. There was definitely romantic tension beginning on their second meeting, and I did not believe that Lizzy actually "hated" him at any point in time. She acted more like she was just trying to shove him out of her head. I much prefer how the A&E version developed their relationship. Mr. Darcy shows absolutely no hint of his feelings prior to his first proposal and Lizzy does not even begin to think of him romantically until the last 1/4 of the movie. This, I think, more clearly reveals the "Pride" and "Prejudice". Aside from how the relationship developed differently, Colin Firth was so much more attractive and was able to achieve a truly "arrogant" and "aloof" character prior to swallowing his pride. He is, I believe, the epitimy of the true gentleman and I can pretty much guarantee that every single girl will swoon as he begins to woo his love.

Regardless of which version you watch, however, the scene of the second proposal is quite possibly the most romantic instance in all of cinematic history. I mean, who wouldn't want to be told that "You have bewitched me body and soul" ? I get chills just thinking about that. Plus Mr. Darcy's character becomes such a gentle person to the one he loves, and you can just tell that he intends to love and protect her, while still respecting her and her mind, for the rest of their lives. Now, tell me what girl doesn't envision that as what she truly wants in a relationship?

So, that is my commentary. . .those who are fellow fans of this wonderful love story please comment away!

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Chick Flick....Memory of you & Rauls'
mom wrtapped up in Hawk Blakets watching every version of Pride & Prejudice ever made....including Bollywood movie

Anonymous said...

Ok, finally saw the Hollywood version of P&P, and of coarse, I stand by my love of the A&E one. I did like it, but I agree definatly on a lot of your points you brought up, and especially the one that Colin Firth IS MR.DARCY. Hands down. Though I will give Keira and Matthew Macfadyen props for the first proposal scene in the rain, very well done! but yeah, second proposal goes to A&E when Darcy tells Lizzy he still loves her and the little gasp she does after hearing it as their walking down the lane... ugh! I LOVE IT!! Gets me EVERY time. I have more I could say but it's late and this is what I wanted to put my two cents in on. :-) -B

quijotefan83 said...

One word, weird pronunciation...
"Privacy"
(Pri-vuh-see).

AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH!! ... that's why I like the A&E one better.
"Yes, I will give you your priv-uh-see."
"Oh terribly sorry, you must want your priv-uh-see."
There was just no "priv-uh-see" in the Keira Knightley version.

Anonymous said...

Just saw the Bollywood version again this a.m. while waiting on BB to start (I love spring break!). {Hee, hee, and OU lost!} Each one of these is wonderful in its own way...you just have to appreciate each for what it is. And hopefully own them all, so you can pick one depending on your free time and mood. However, there was a version done in the 1940s or 1950s that sucked. Not even Jane could save that one.
Now, how about the Timothy Dalton vs. the William Hurt (gag) "Jane Eyre"? No contest, right?!
R's M

Anonymous said...

And, by the way, remind my son that Mother's Day is coming!

Raoul The Destroyer said...

???

It's nearly a month away!!!

Anonymous said...

Two months! Plan ahead....